I hate numbers. Other than the fact that I like to think that I’m somewhat decent at writing, that is why I’m a journalism major. I use social media to push my content to readers, content that takes a lot of work and time out of my day. The fact that a bunch of numbers control how many people see my content, or if people see it at all, rubs me the wrong way.
To be frank, if it weren’t for one of today’s readings, I would not be able to define an algorithm for you. Most math terminology is way beyond me and algorithms fall under the I don’t know what the hell I’m talking about category. I always knew that algorithms controlled how content on social media is sequenced, but I never realized the extent of it.
I’m not knocking algorithms completely, because they do have a positive impact in some cases. People have specific content that they want to read and for the most part, algorithms group that content together. Content that one would find interesting goes to the top of the timeline, while content that has nothing to do with what one couldn’t care less about gets shoved to the bottom of the feed.
Social media networks are able to gather the data necessary to determine an algorithm based on one’s actions on social media. Websites such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram analyze which posts people spend the most time on, what generates the most clicks, and which posts people share.
In this sense, algorithms are a positive. Nobody wants to read or click on stuff that they are not interested in. However, algorithms have a tendency to bury well-written content, while other stuff is pushed to the top for absolutely no reason.
When I first started writing at Jets Wire, we had this one post that garnered about 70,000 views in its first day on the web. It was not one of our well-written columns that required plenty of thought in recent. It was not a slideshow detailing which players the Jets should target in free agency or the NFL Draft. Instead, it was a post of a video of former Jets center Nick Mangold sliding down a waterslide while on vacation with his kids.
That’s right, a video of an offensive lineman sliding down a waterslide at Disney stole the show, while other actual journalism didn’t get any attention. Why? Because somewhere along the line, some algorithm decided that the Mangold post was a more appealing one. From a journalistic standpoint, the story was crap. It took about five minutes to write and a video was embedded. That doesn’t matter to the algorithm, though.
Last night, I wrote a 900-word article outlining what the Jets should pitch running back Le’Veon Bell. Will people see it or read it? Who knows. I’m praying that the algorithm works in my favor. Whether I like it or not, a bunch of variables and numbers will determine whether or not my work gets any attention.
Who knows if you’ll wind up even seeing this post.
Calvaruso's Corner 