Celebrities have the power to influence the popularity of social media platforms

In an era where celebrities are idolized and in some cases, worshiped, everything they say or do is taken as law by their fans.

If a celebrity doesn’t like a certain food, neither will their fans. If they buy a certain kind of car and talk about how luxurious it is, chances are their fans will want to buy one of their own, even if they can’t afford it. The same applies to social media use, as celebrities have recently spoken out against one of the most popular social media platforms of the generation: Snapchat.

Rihanna and Kylie Jenner are among the celebrities who have had something to say about the social platforms, with most of the focus being on Snapchat. Rihanna has a legitimate gripe with the company, as it posted a story asking users if they would rather slap Rihanna or punch Chris Brown. Given Rihanna’s domestic violence incident with Brown, her displeasure with the company comes as no surprise.

“Now SNAPCHAT I know you already know you ain’t my fav app out there!” Rihanna said in an Instagram post. “But I’m just trying to figure out what the point was with this mess! I’d love to call it ignorance, but I know you ain’t that dumb!”

With those comments came a decline in Snapchat’s share price. Rihanna used Instagram, arguably Snapchat’s main competitor, to bash the company and urge her fans to delete the app. Jenner did the same by simply stating that she never even opens Snapchat anymore and questioned if anyone else did.

I understand the outrage of Rihanna’s fanbase over the Snapchat post and for those who love the artist, but Jenner simply saying she doesn’t like the app resulting in it being deleted and its stock dropping as a result is ridiculous to me. Personally, I would never be influenced by what some celebrity says about an app. If I like the app, I’m going to use it, whether Kylie Jenner likes it or not.

I side more with Neil Patel. Both apps are great to use and I continue to use them as such. Instagram and Snapchat have different audiences and people use the platforms to tell a different story. The way I see it, my intent is to keep using both Instagram and Snapchat as I have been. No celebrity is going to be able to tell me otherwise.

Instagram and Pintrest: Photojournalist’s best friend, Photographer’s foe

With so much emphasis being placed on print media and the written word, photojournalists often fly under the radar. With the focus being on photography first and words second, photojournalists don’t have many ideal platforms to share their content. However, with the emergence of Instagram and Pinterest in recent years, photojournalists finally have a place where they can shine.

Social media networks such as Twitter and Facebook are comparative to print media. While photos are used on those networks, the written word is the focus of the content. With Instagram and Pinterest, photography is the focus. Ranging from amateurs to veterans of the field, photojournalists employ the use of those two photo-centric networks to make their work stand out. Both networks are also free to use, making them all the more accessible and easy to use.

Image result for instagram — Instagram has impacted the photography field and the ability of photojournalists to get their content noticed/Photo via The Verge

While Instagram and Pinterest have proven to be unique, they have also been threatening to a field outside of journalism. For years, professional photographers have been employed to provide print and digital media outlets for their content. With the emergence of photographers on Instagram and Pinterest, professional photographers have kind of fallen by the wayside in terms of their ability to produce unique content and sell it to news organizations. Why pay for a product when similar-quality photos can be found on Instagram and Pinterest for a much lesser price? In some cases, those photos are even free as long as the photographer’s Instagram or Pinterest page is credited.

Instagram and Pinterest have certainly been positive developments, but they have also put professional photographers in jeopardy — especially the freelance ones. Those who are employed for photography companies such as USA TODAY Sports Images are safe and do not have to worry, as their photos are exclusive to that network and will be used by all of the writers in the network. However, freelance photographers now have their backs up against the wall in terms of finding work. Instagram and Pinterest have created an interesting dynamic within the field.

Algorithms make it unknown whether or not your content will be seen

I hate numbers. Other than the fact that I like to think that I’m somewhat decent at writing, that is why I’m a journalism major. I use social media to push my content to readers, content that takes a lot of work and time out of my day. The fact that a bunch of numbers control how many people see my content, or if people see it at all, rubs me the wrong way.

To be frank, if it weren’t for one of today’s readings, I would not be able to define an algorithm for you. Most math terminology is way beyond me and algorithms fall under the I don’t know what the hell I’m talking about category. I always knew that algorithms controlled how content on social media is sequenced, but I never realized the extent of it.

I’m not knocking algorithms completely, because they do have a positive impact in some cases. People have specific content that they want to read and for the most part, algorithms group that content together. Content that one would find interesting goes to the top of the timeline, while content that has nothing to do with what one couldn’t care less about gets shoved to the bottom of the feed.

Social media networks are able to gather the data necessary to determine an algorithm based on one’s actions on social media. Websites such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram analyze which posts people spend the most time on, what generates the most clicks, and which posts people share.

Image result for Twitter timeline — Twitter algorithms play a major role in deciding if one’s content is seen/Photo via Buffer

In this sense, algorithms are a positive. Nobody wants to read or click on stuff that they are not interested in. However, algorithms have a tendency to bury well-written content, while other stuff is pushed to the top for absolutely no reason.

When I first started writing at Jets Wire, we had this one post that garnered about 70,000 views in its first day on the web. It was not one of our well-written columns that required plenty of thought in recent. It was not a slideshow detailing which players the Jets should target in free agency or the NFL Draft. Instead, it was a post of a video of former Jets center Nick Mangold sliding down a waterslide while on vacation with his kids.

That’s right, a video of an offensive lineman sliding down a waterslide at Disney stole the show, while other actual journalism didn’t get any attention. Why? Because somewhere along the line, some algorithm decided that the Mangold post was a more appealing one. From a journalistic standpoint, the story was crap. It took about five minutes to write and a video was embedded. That doesn’t matter to the algorithm, though.

Last night, I wrote a 900-word article outlining what the Jets should pitch running back Le’Veon Bell. Will people see it or read it? Who knows. I’m praying that the algorithm works in my favor. Whether I like it or not, a bunch of variables and numbers will determine whether or not my work gets any attention.

Who knows if you’ll wind up even seeing this post.

Blogs Are Trending Towards Being The Future of Journalism and Public Relations

As large-scale social media corporations such as Facebook run into a constant wall of problems, smaller blog websites are slowly becoming the wave of the future in journalism and public relations.

Traditionally, websites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn are used to build a brand. They are the most used and most viewed social media websites out there and naturally, using them is the easiest way to build a brand. Journalists use all four websites to push their content and opinions, just like people in the public relations industry use the four websites to push marketing campaigns and advertising.

The tide is beginning to turn, though, as those in both the journalism and PR industries are beginning to take notice of bloggers who may not have as big of a brand as those on bigger social media websites. As stated in Blogs as Excellent Public Relations Tools, a growing number of journalists and news editors are reading blog posts on a daily basis to find new, unique story ideas.

Coming from someone who does not work on a blog, but a smaller website, I have seen this take place first-hand. As a writer for JetsWire, a part of the USA TODAY Sports Media Group, unique column and slideshow ideas that we have used on our website have trickled down to the bigger websites, such as Bleacher Report. Likewise, there are Jets blogs and other websites that cover the team that we look at to find new story ideas of our own. It’s an effective tool to come up with “new” story ideas, especially when content is running dry.

Blogs are a new and arguably improved way for journalists and those in the Public Relations field to have their voices heard/Photo via Bizztor

None of this is possible without a little self-branding, though. The same way people try to push content on social media, bloggers must build their brand to the point where they are a reliable and recognizable name. As I mentioned before, some of the work published on Jets Wire has been attributed on Jets Wire. At times, I have been specifically name-dropped in those attributions. Those instances of acknowledgment are essentially free publicity for the Jets Wire brand and my own personal brand, as I am gaining credibility by being featured on a “bigger” site.

Bloggers have the freedom to publish individualized content and truly have their own voice — something that is not possible at times in the journalism and public relations field. Unless you’re writing a column of some sort, oftentimes journalists are required to cater to a target audience specified by their employer. For PR employees, there’s no chance to have an individual’s voice heard in a press release.

Blogs are providing a new and fresh platform for writers to get noticed. It might take a while, but it wouldn’t be much of a shock to see blogs and bloggers take over the industry before long.

Social Media Takes Center Stage in Evolving Journalism and Public Relations Industries

As the journalism and public relations industries continue to evolve and catch up with the times, social media has been at the forefront of the evolution. Social media networks such as Twitter, Instagram and Facebook have made it easier than ever to get a message across to a specific audience. The days of print media serving as the dominant news source are over. Now, at the click of a button, news and advertising, among other things, are readily available.

As Forbes contributor Robert Wynne states, there are three forks in the road of the public relations industry: Traditional PR, Advocacy PR and social media. Each one has its place in the field and large PR firms have the ability to use all three, but social media has become the dominant one in recent years. It makes sense that this is the case, as it is the most cost-effective option. Why pay thousands of dollars for the services of a seasoned veteran when an intern could accomplish the same thing on essentially a minimum wage salary? Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, among others, also have a very wide reach. In 2019, social media is arguably the most impactful form of communication. It’s only fitting that PR firms start exploring social media to reach a wider audience and drive down costs in the process.

The same goes in the journalism industry. Given the nature of the business and the world’s desire to have news delivered to them almost instantaneously, social media is more prevalent than ever. Why wait to read the newspaper in the morning when the article can be posted online, Tweeted out by an individual or publication and then shared for millions to see? Numerous newspaper outlets are dying out due to the evolution of social media and the desire for a digital product. Even large media firms, such as Gannett, have focused on expanding their digital presence instead of working to save their print papers, as Clay Shirky points out.

In recent years, social media networks such have Twitter have altered the landscape of the journalism and public relations industries/Photo via Business Insider

The audience has changed. The younger generations no longer want to wait for the news to be delivered to their doorstep when all they have to do is hop on a laptop, go on Twitter, Facebook, or another social media platform, and check out the day’s latest news. Especially in the sports media industry, fans and beat writers react as the action takes place. Game recaps, analysis and columns are posted within seconds of a game ending and there is no longer a “wait to see the box score in the morning” mindset.

People no longer want to wait for their desired product. They want it as soon as possible. Public relations firms and big-time news corporations are not deaf to this and have taken the necessary strides to ensure that they remain afloat. In only a matter of years, social media has entered the two industries and have taken them by storm. Essentially, it has changed the two industries as we know them into completely different monsters.